To download a PDF file of this update, click here
Consent-Once-Removed:
When Your Houseguest Brings The Police With Him
Legal Question of The Week
Vol. 2, Number 5
February 20, 2009
Brian Beasley
Good Host and Legal Adviser, HPPD
Several of my eagle-eyed law enforcement friends contacted me recently about a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling that they found interesting. It deals with a doctrine called “consent-once-removed.” Contrary to popular belief, this doctrine has nothing to do with that girl you brought home who has been leading you on all night only to shoot you down at the last possible moment.1 Instead, the “once-removed” in “consent-once-removed” is like the “once-removed” when you have a second cousin “once-removed.”2 3 This doctrine deals with whether consent given to an undercover officer or a person acting as an agent of an officer grants consent to all law enforcement officers to enter a house without a warrant. Read More
- Not that I know anything about that from personal experience. It happened to a friend of mine. Really. He told me about it. It didn’t happen to me. ↩
- I’ve never understood how this relative stuff works. And before you start working on the email that will explain it to me, please understand that I don’t care how it works . ↩
- That’s not to say that your cousin once removed can’t lead you on all night only to shoot you down at the last moment, but that’s sick and I promised the Chief that I wouldn’t include any more incest jokes in these updates. On a related note, North Carolina allows you to marry your first cousin, so I guess this wasn’t an incest joke after all. ↩
