To download a PDF file of this update, click here
Discovery Dilemmas:
Keeping Your Cards Close To Your Chest
Legal Question of The Week
Vol. 2, Number 8
March 27, 2009
Brian Beasley
Occasional Card Shark and Legal Adviser, HPPD
Suppose you are playing a friendly game of No Limit Texas Hold’em, Gin Rummy, or my personal favorite, Crazy Eights.1 You learn from an early age that you have to keep your cards close to your chest unless you want your opponent to know what you have in your hand and therefore give him an unfair advantage. Applying that lesson to our adversarial criminal justice system, we sometimes feel the need to hold back information from the defense so they don’t gain an unfair advantage at trial.2 The information shared between parties to a lawsuit (whether civil or criminal) is called discovery, and like everything else in our system is governed by both constitutional and statutory laws. In this update, we’ll look together at what has to be turned over to the defense. Read More
- Of course, none of these games would be played for money. I’m already in trouble enough with Tony Staley over the APPEARANCE that I might have possibly entered an NCAA tournament pool contest (maybe). And I purposely left strip poker off the list. This is a family publication, after all. ↩
- I know that sometimes this is not about “advantage” or “disadvantage” at trial but the fact that the particular defense attorney that is asking for the information is a jerk, or worse. But the best revenge against unscrupulous or unethical attorneys is beating them over the head with a strong case that you have put together while following all laws and rules to the letter. Please do not stoop to the level of your adversaries by trying to cut corners and cleverly trick them with misdirection or outright deception. You will end up losing in the long run. ↩
